The template itself looks okay, but the image used for the title is no longer properly centered. Since you have objections, I won't add it, but you should have a look at it yourself. ![]() Also, I previewed the shortcut template on the main SP page ( Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost), and if you place it before the "Signpost" picture, it appears exactly to the right of it and looks good. However, I would ask that no shortcut template be added to this page, as it would interfere with the visual presentation of the material. Either WP:WSP or WP:SIGN would be my choices, or both could be created. How about WP:SIGN? nine thirty- five 22:50, (UTC) If somebody wants to create a shortcut, that's fine. Is there a special rule/procedere for shortcuts or can I just make one? Anyone opposing? - grm wnr 21:03, (UTC) Can it get a Shortcut? I think WP:WSP or WP:WPSP or even WP:WISP (I prefer the first one) would be appropriate, since WP:SP is already taken. I think the Signpost is eminently important. Stories will be rotated by moving all of the current stories to an archive when a new issue is published. Granted, the news items themselves happen at different times, but some happen over the course of days, so I'm not going to try and organize by which came first. The same date applies to all headlines, and the stories themselves are dated in the bylines, so chronology is less of an issue. In terms of the date, it's on the page itself below the logo, in the right-hand margin. ja:Wikipedia:大使館(now retired) and ja:Wikipedia:ウィキメディアニュース are basically organized in that way (though not using any subpage because reports are shorter). That would way, you do not have to think hard about which story to keep/remove, etc. give each item some key words or categories - "technical," "dispute resolution," "policies and guidelines," etc.Regarding the formt, I think it might be easier to maintain the page if you Hi, thank you for initiating this valuable project.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |